METAMORPHOSES OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL STRUCTURE OF THE DONETSK PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC MODERN TERRITORY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The purpose of the article is to summarize the existing development experience of the Donetsk People’s Republic in the context of the administrative and territorial structure’s formation and improvement. The authors summarize the existing experience of administrative and territorial division, highlight the most characteristic features of possible transformations, and substantiate the need for early implementation of federal legislation into the current activities of state and local government bodies using logical, comparative, descriptive, and cartographic methods, as well as the method of analogies. The article identifies patterns of the administrative-territorial arrangement transformation in specific historical conditions, establishes cause-and-effect relationships between transformations in social production and changes in territorial development, distinguishes individual economic interest groups that generate contradictions in public relations, identifies the concentration factors for public production facilities in certain territories, visualizes the results of administrative boundaries administrative-territorial entities’ structure changes using maps. The article describes the chronology of transformations in the structure of administrative-territorial units over more than 100 years of Donbass’s existence in modern history. The Soviet period (1917–1991) is characterized by changes in administrative boundaries and the structure of administrative-territorial entities. The Ukrainian period (1991–2014) is distinguished by the intensified tension between local governments and central authorities, management. The period of statehood (2014–2022) is characterized by the completion of preparatory work preceding the entry of the Donetsk People’s Republic into the Russian Federation.

Keywords:
administrative-territorial structure, administrative boundaries, urban agglomeration, megapolis, municipal arrangement, territory, territorial development
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Akhanov S. A. Public production efficiency. Three levels of analysis: National economic, regional, self-supporting. Moscow: Mysl, 1987, 165. (In Russ.)

2. Brown M. C. Using gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: Theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta data. Social Science & Medicine, 1994, 38(9): 1243–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90189-9

3. Turovsky R. F. Balance in "center – regions" relationships as a basis of terrestrial-state construction. World Economy and International Relations, 2003, (12): 54–65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2003-12-54-65

4. Lukianchenko A. A., Amitan V. N. The concept of forming local budgets based on the distribution of powers principle. Donetsk: Iugo-Vostok, 1999, 38. (In Russ.)

5. Solodukhin Yu. Constitutional foundations of Russian federalism: Unsolved problems. Federalism, 2003, (2): 21–36. (In Russ.)

6. Mamutov V. K. Donetsk megapolis – development strategy. Problems of modern city development: Proc. Intern. Sci.-Prac. Seminar, Donetsk, 17 Oct 1996. Donetsk: IELR NASU, 1996, 3–7. (In Russ.)

7. Osadchaia N. V., Galiasovskaia O. V. Decentralization in Ukraine: Trends and aspects. Ekonomicheskii vestnik Donbassa, 2016, (2): 56–63. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wrqaxv

8. Belous Ia. Iu. Problems and prospects of territorial communities development in Ukraine. Proceeedings of BSTU, issue 5, Economics and management, 2017, (2): 91–97. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ymigbf

9. Batazhok S. G. Budget-financial decentralization as a factor of strengthening local self-government in Ukraine. Formuvannâ rinkovih vìdnosin v Ukraïnì, 2018, (7-8): 36–45. (In Ukr.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ypwcsl

10. Zakharchenko V. I. Analysis of measures for financial decentralization in the context sustainable development of territories. Formuvannâ rinkovih vìdnosin v Ukraïnì, 2018, (12): 98–108. (In Ukr.) https://www.elibrary.ru/yyhmsl

11. Gusakov T. Yu. Municipal reform of 2015 in Ukraine: Implementation and first results. Russian Peasant Studies, 2019, 4(2): 138–159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2019-4-2-138-159

12. Slinko E. A., Kapustin V. I. Local government reform in Ukraine: interim results of decentralization. Region: systems, economics, management, 2020, (2): 150–156. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lyewjm

13. Lukianchenko A. A. Transport structures of the diversified cities economy. Gosudarstvo i regiony. Seriia: Ekonomika i predpriiatie, 2002, (2): 4–19. (In Russ.)

14. Gabaix X., Ioannides Y. M. The evolution of city size distributions. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, eds. Henderson J. V., Thisse J.-F. Elsevier, 2004, vol. 4, 2341–2378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80010-5

15. Lyubimtseva S. V. Economic systems transformation. Moscow: Ekonomist, 2003, 443. (In Russ.)

16. Ciccone A. Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review, 2002, 46(2): 213–227.

17. Ostrom E. Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 1972, 53(3): 474–493.

18. Krugman P. Space: The final frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12(2): 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.2.161

19. Leksin V., Shvetsov A. Fiscal federalism: The dialectic of centralization and decentralization. Russian Economic Journal, 2002, (7): 53–77. (In Russ.)

20. Corrado L., Fingleton B. Where is the economics in spatial econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 2012, 52(2): 210–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00726.x

21. Kuznetsova O. V., Lavrov A. M. Territorial redistribution of the budget: A comparative analysis of the models of budget federalism. Region: Economics and Sociology, 1996, (3): 21–39. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wejwjd

22. Vasilenko V. N. Distribution of competence (powers) between state authorities and local self-government bodies. Regional self-government. Donetsk: IESPA NASU, 2005, 60–87. (In Russ.)

23. Mamutov V. K. Looking from Donbass. Donetsk: Iugo-Vostok, 2007, 267. (In Russ.)

24. Bogachev S. V., Melnikova M. V., Lukianchenko A. A. Problems of urban economic system development theory and practice. Donetsk: Iugo-Vostok, 2006, 381. (In Russ.)

25. Vasilenko V. N. Thoughts aloud, or a conversation on a given topic. Donetsk: IP Kirienko S. G., 2023, 134. (In Russ.)

26. Vasilenko D. V. Strategic priorities of territorial development: From search to implemen­tation. Moscow: BukiVedi, 2019, 368. (In Russ.)

27. Piatkova N. P. State policy of territorial development: Problems and solutions. Lugansk: Noulidzh, 2020, 308. (In Russ.)


Login or Create
* Forgot password?