St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Attempts to conceptualize the integration of migrants in society regularly face criticism within the academic community; the term integration does not have a generally accepted definition. The article offers an analysis of Russian migrants integration policy. The purpose of the study is to clarify the meaning of the term integration, as well as to compare integration theories with practical measures of immigrant integration. The authors define the concept of integration, explore its conceptual foundations, and shed light on some contradictions of its use in political discourse and scientific literature. The concept of integration is defined as the inclusion of an individual in a certain host community’s social ties structure. Using the content analysis method, the article considers the place of integration concept in the fundamental documents of the Russian immigration policy. The authors conclude that the Russian integration policy has its faults. There is a gap between the integration policy and the realities of the migrants' existence, which prevents the effective inclusion of migrants in Russian society. Solving the problem requires close cooperation between various actors of migration policy, including non-profit civil organizations.
immigration, integration, integration of immigrants, immigration policy, integration policy, state policy
1. Kymlicka W. Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University, 1996, 280. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198290918.001.0001
2. Taylor C. The politics of recognition. Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition, ed. Gutmann A. Princeton: Princeton University, 1994, 25-73.
3. Alba R., Nee V. Remaking the American mainstream: assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2005, 384.
4. Brubaker R. The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2001, 24(4): 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120049770
5. Zapata-Barrero R. Intercultural policy and multi-level governance in Barcelona: mainstreaming comprehensive approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2017, 83(2): 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315592962
6. Schinkel W. Against "immigrant integration": for an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies, 2018, (6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1
7. Joppke C., Morawska E. Towards assimilation and citizenship: immigrants in liberal nation-states. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, 252.
8. Urinboyev R. Migration and hybrid political regimes: navigating the legal landscape in Russia. Oakland: University of California, 2021, 184. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.96
9. Abdou L. H. Immigrant integration: the governance of ethno-cultural differences. Comparative Migration Studies, 2019, (7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0124-8
10. Honneth A. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflict. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1995, 240.
11. Brubaker R., Cooper F. Beyond "identity". Theory and Society, 2000, 29(1): 1-47.
12. Parsons T. Durkheim’s contribution to the theory of integration of social systems. Emile Durkheim, 1858-1917, ed. Wolff K. H. Columbus: Ohio State University, 1960, 118-153.
13. Schnapper D. Qu’est-ce que l’intégration? Paris: Gallimard, 2007, 256.
14. Vadot M. De quoi Intégration est-il le nom? L’importation d’une querelle de mots dans le champ de la formation linguistique des migrants. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2016, (17). https://doi.org/10.4000/aad.2228
15. Sayad A. Qu'est-ce que l'intégration? Hommes et Migrations, 1994, (1182): 8-14.
16. Beaman J. Citizen outsider: children of North African immigrants in France. Oakland: University of California, 2017, 168. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.39
17. Malakhov V. S. Integration of migrants: concepts and practices. Moscow: Liberalnaia Missiia, 2015, 272. (In Russ.)
18. Ilimbetova A. A. Adaptation and integration of migrants: conditions, goals, approaches. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021, (2): 144-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2021_2_144_155
19. Varshaver E. A. Integration of migrants through the lens of a constructivist approach to ethnicity. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 2023, 25(2): 377-396. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-377-396
20. Dmitrieva T. N. On the prospects of socio-cultural integration of forced migrants. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2023, (2): 61-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2023-2-61-63
21. Maslennikov V. M., Achkasov V. A. Prospects for the involvement of the civil society institutions in the implementation of ethnic politics in St. Petersburg. Journal of Ethnopolitics, 2019, (2): 24-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-7041-2019-2-24-39
22. Osipov A. G. Construction of ethnic conflict and racist discourse. Racism in the language of the social sciences, eds. Voronkov V., Osipov A. G., Karpenko O. V. St. Petersburg: Aletheia, 2002, 45-69. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/sirvhd
23. Panikar M. M., Sokolova F. Kh., Shaparov A. E., Zolotarev O. V., Kapitsyn V. M. Integration mechanisms for immigrants in Norway and Russia: a comparative analysis. Arktika i Sever, 2019, (35): 119-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2019.35.119
24. Thomas W. I., Znaniecki F. The Polish peasant in Europe and America. N. Y.: Dover, 1958, vol. 1, 2250.
25. Gordon M. Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion, and national origin. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1964, 288.
26. Achkasov V. A. Dilemmas of the Russian immigration policy. Vlast i elity, 2014, (1): 193-206. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/xiemtn
27. Sayad A. The suffering of the immigrant. Paris: Le Seuil, 1999, 448. (In Fr.)
28. Poletaev D. V. Xenophobia and migration policy. Migrants, xenophobia and migration policy, ed. Mukomel V. I. Moscow: Academia, 2014, 5-19. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/jubmkk
29. Wimmer A., Soehl T. Blocked acculturation: cultural heterodoxy among Europe’s immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 2014, 120(1): 146-186. https://doi.org/10.1086/677207
30. Malakhov V. S. Immigrants integration as an administrative problem: the case of the European Union. World Economy and International Relations, 2015, (1): 77-87. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/tkgrmp
31. Campomori F., Caponio T. Immigrant integration policymaking in Italy: regional policies in a multi-level governance perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2017, 83(2): 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315611238
