from 01.01.2020 until now
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Kemerovo branch)
from 01.01.2019 to 01.01.2020
Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation
from 01.01.2009 to 01.01.2019
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Scientific forecasting and long-term planning of social development cannot ignore such a key structural component of modern society as the state. This article describes the prospects for the development of the state in the XXI century, the main factors of state transformation, and the most common interpretations of their consequences. The list of factors includes globalization, scientific and technological progress, competing multinational companies, and various supranational structures. The research revealed four scenarios. (1) The state gives place to new management systems. (2) The main political centers remain either as executive units of supranational structures, or as relatively independent macro-formations. (3) National states degenerate into new political forms under the influence of modern social factors. (4) New autarkies or neo-autarkies appear on the territories of contemporary states. Most forecasters foretell those states are bound to lose their independence of internal and foreign policy on a planetary scale. Some of them see a process of transition to new non-state models of society management. Others declare that states will grow in strength in the historical perspective, reaching the form of autarky, and on stronger grounds than ever before. The future of the state in this century depends not on political relations, but on the transformation of personality, values, and connections. The future of the state as an independent subject of domestic or foreign policy depends on its ability to respond to the challenges of modern civilization.
globalization, network, corporation, state, autarky, sovereignty
1. Beck U. What is globalization? Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia, 2001, 304. (In Russ.) EDN: RAYTKT
2. Gavrilov E. O. Digital sovereignty in the context of globalization: philosophical and legal aspects. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2020, 4(2): 146-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2020-4-2-146-152
3. Castells M., Kiselyova E. Russia and the network society. An analytical exploration. Mir Rossii, 2000, 9(1): 23-51. (In Russ.) EDN: TFASJH
4. Bykov E. M. NBIC-converging technologies: historical overview. Part II: 2007-2013. NBICS-Science. Technology, 2017, (2): 24-36. (In Russ.)
5. Dubrovsky D. I. NBICS-convergence: some theoretical and methodological issues. NBICS-Science. Technology, 2017, (2): 37-45. (In Russ.)
6. Filipova I. A. Artificial intelligence and neurotechnologies: in need for constitutional and legal regulation. Lex Russica, 2021, 74(9): 119-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2021.178.9.119-130
7. Buryanov M. S. Global digital human rights in the context of risks of digitalization. Vek globalizatsii, 2020, (3): 54-70. (In Russ.) EDN: HJDRBU
8. Kodaneva S. I. Digital government: the state as a platform. Sotsialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia literatura. Seriia 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2022, (3): 8-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/rgpravo/2022.03.01
9. Gavrilov E. O. The ecosystem of modern society as a new environment for organizing a system of social relations. Social communications: philosophical, political, cultural, and historical dimensions: Proc. II All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf. with Intern. Participation, Kemerovo, 23 Apr 2021. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2021, 13-19. (In Russ.) EDN: BBPWZZ
10. Burov V. V., Petrov M. V., Shklyaruk M. S., Sharov A. V. ‘State-as-platform’: implementation effects and deployment management. Public administration, 2018, 20(4): 17-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2018-20-4-17-26
11. Ivanko A. F., Ivanko M. A., Butyrskaya D. V. Artificial intelligence and public administration. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniia, 2019, (3). (In Russ.) URL: https://scientificreview.ru/ru/article/view?id=66 (accessed 10 Sep 2022).
12. Talapina E. V. Artificial intelligence processing and risks of discrimination. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2022, 15(1): 4-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2022.1.4.27
13. Kharitonova Yu. S., Savina V. S., Pagnini F. Artificial intelligence's algorithmic bias: ethical and legal issues. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki, 2021, (53): 488-515. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2021-53-488-515
14. Smyrnaios N. The GAFAM effect: Strategies and logics of the internet oligopoly. Communication & Langages, 2016, 188(2): 61-83.
15. Ziboreva O. Yu., Rasputina A. V. Trends in the development of international audit activities in the era of economy globalization. Izvestiya Baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2018, 28(3): 442-451. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-2759.2018.28(3).442-451
16. Eremin V. V., Krupnov Yu. A., Zolotarev E. V., Reshetnikov S. B. Global corporate control as a threat to the economic security of the Russian Federation. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo, 2022, 15(4): 66-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-4-66-76
17. Kazantseva E. G. Stability of an oligopoly as market structure. New technologies, 2011, (3): 101-105. (In Russ.) EDN: OJGDZH
18. Gavrilov E. O., Kandrov M. I. Legal and organizational aspects of the position of shadow director of an offshore company: powers, identification, and responsibility. Young Russia: Proc. XII All-Russian Sci.-Prac. Conf. of young scientists with Intern. participation, Kemerovo, 21-24 Apr 2020. Kemerovo: KuzSTU, 2020, 63003.1-63003.9. (In Russ.) EDN: UZJFYQ
19. Tenyakov I. M., Khubiev K. A., Epstein D. B., Zazdravnykh A. V. Stagnation in Russia in geopolitical and economic contexts: new alternatives. Terra Economicus, 2022, 20(2): 40-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-2-40-58
20. Attali J. A brief history of the future. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2014, 288. (In Russ.)
21. Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: Eksmo, 2021, 208. (In Russ.)
22. Keys K. S. Jr., Fresco J. A look into the future. 1969, 119. (In Russ.)
23. Delyagin M. G. The end of the era: Stand clear of the opening door! Vol. I. General theory of globalization. Moscow: IPROG, Knizhnyi mir, 2019, 832. (In Russ.)
24. Morozova E. V., Miroshnichenko I. V. Hybrid political institutions in modern polities. Vest. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 21. Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo), 2015, (3): 34-46. (In Russ.) EDN: UAPSGF
25. Schmitter P. C. Dangers and dilemmas of democracy. Vek XX i mir, 1994, (7-8). (In Russ.) URL: http://old.russ.ru/antolog/predely/1/dem2-2.htm (accessed 10 Sep 2022).
26. Harari Y. N. 21 lessons for the 21st century. Moscow: Sindbad, 2019, 416. (In Russ.)
27. Chetverikova O. N. Dictatorship of the "enlightened": the spirit and goals of transhumanism. Moscow: Blagoslovenie, 2016, 160. (In Russ.) EDN: BAYLME
28. Romanovskaya V. B., Tsyganov V. I. From autarky to anti-globalization: the continuity of ideas in political and legal discourse. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2015, (5-6): 307-311. (In Russ.) EDN: VNTPTR
29. Pelih S. A. Neoavtarkia is a possible strategy for the economic development of the union state. Economic revival of Russia, 2017, (3): 90-94. (In Russ.) EDN: ZHLETD
30. Baburin S. N. Integration constitutionalism. Moscow: Norma; INFRA-M, 2022, 264. (In Russ.) EDN: IRKRRA
31. Baburin S. N. Spiritual and moral factor of constitutional transformations of administrative legal relations. Pravovaia politika i pravovaia zhizn, 2022, (2): 40-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/1608-8794-2022-2-44-52
32. Gavrilov E. O., Gavrilov O. F. Utopia and ideology as forms of social design: patterns of functioning. In: Gavrilov O. F., Gavrilov E. O., Gritskevich T. I., Zhukova O. I., Kazakov E. F. Modes of social interaction: concepts of identity, spiritual experience, and social transformation. Kemerovo: KemSU, 2020, 10-37. (In Russ.) EDN: MESKCD
