Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Equal opportunity theory is based on the idea that inequality of individual achievements is a complex phenomenon. It is formed by two groups of factors: (1) one's own decisions and efforts (inequality of efforts) and (2) circumstances beyond one's control (inequality of opportunities). Therefore, wealth inequality caused by effort factors (1) is fair and is not to be compensated for, whereas differences in welfare caused by objective circumstances (2) are unfair and should be compensable (the compensation principle). This paper introduces an assessment of circumstances associated with family background: composition, psychological atmosphere, well-being, occupation, education, etc. Parents' education and two-parent status appeared to be the most important circumstances. Respondents who grew up in a two-parent family with both biological parents had a higher income than those who grew up in one-parent families or with one biological and one stepparent. The low economic status of the parental family also proved to affect the well-being of grown-up children. Thus, efforts to provide equal opportunities can have a long-term effect on social inequality and build a more just society.

factors-efforts, factors-circumstances, compensation principle, family background, family policy, regression, social survey
Publication text (PDF): Read Download

1. Transition report 2016–17. Transition for all: equal opportunities in an unequal world. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and De-velopment, 2016, 108. Available at: https://www.ebrd.com/news/publications/transition-report/transition-report-201617.html (ac-cessed 8 Oct 2021).

2. El Enbaby H., Galal R. Inequality of opportunity in individuals' wages and households' assets in Egypt. Working Paper № 942. Giza: Eco-nomic Research Forum, 2015, 31. Available at: http://bit.ly/2mR4uth (accessed 8 Oct 2021).

3. Ferreira F. H. G., Gignoux J. The measurement of inequality of opportunity: theory and an application to Latin America. Review of Income and Wealth, 2011, 57(4): 622–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2011.00467.x

4. Ibragimova Z. F., Frants M. V. Inequality of opportunity in the Russian Federation: measurement and evaluation using micro-data. Applied Econometrics, 2019, (2): 5–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/1993-7601-2019 10001

5. Hederos K., Jäntti M., Lindahl L. Gender and inequality of opportunity in Sweden. Soc Choice Welf, 2017, 49(3-4): 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1076-2

6. Zhang Y., Eriksson T. Inequality of opportunity and income inequality in nine Chinese provinces, 1989–2006. China Economic Review, 2010, 21(4): 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.06.008

7. Ibragimova Z. F., Frants M. V. Information support for research on opportunity inequality: critical review and theoretical foundation. Vest-nik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava, 2019, (11-1): 70–76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.791

8. Bukharbaeva L. Ia., Egorova Iu. V., Ibragimova Z. F., Komleva R. N., Chursina K. V., Frants M. V. Assessment of inequality of opportunities in the Republic of Bashkortostan: research program. Ufa: Aeterna, 2019, 36. (In Russ.)

9. Van de Gaer D. Equality of opportunity and investment in human capital. Dr. Philos. Sci. Diss. Leuven: Catholic University of Leuven, 1993, 172.

10. Marrero G. A., Rodríguez J. G. Inequality of opportunity in Europe. Review of Income and Wealth, 2012, 58(4): 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00496.x

11. Ibragimova Z. F., Frants M. V. Inequality of opportunities in the Russian Federation: factor analysis. Ekonomka i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal, 2019, (5): 10–15. (In Russ.)

12. Ibragimova Z. F., Frants M. V. Is Russia a land of opportunity? It depends on how you look at it. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2020, (6): 4–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1710

13. Shorrocks A. F. Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2013, 11(1): 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9214-z

14. Borisenkov V. P., Gukalenko O. V. The institution of the family and family policy in modern Russia: problems, trends and prospects. Nau-kovedenie, 2014, (5). Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/130PVN514.pdf (accessed 10 Oct 2021). (In Russ.)

15. Petrova I. M. The influence of parental divorce on the mental state of children. Smolenskii meditsinskii almanakh, 2015, (3): 62–64. (In Russ.)

Login or Create
* Forgot password?