Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Journals KemSU
Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Biological, Engineering and Earth Sciences SibScript (until February 17, 2023 – Bulletin of KemSU Strategizing: Theory and Practice Foods and Raw Materials Virtual Communication and Social Networks Food Processing: Techniques and Technology Dairy industry Cheese- and buttermaking Science Evolution
Retraction
Submit manuscript
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences
UDC
34

ON THE IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS On the Importance of Motivation of Judicial Decisions in Criminal Proceedings

Published in Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences · Pages 57–61 · Rubric: JURISPRUDENCE
Received: 26.12.2018 Accepted: 28.12.2018 Published: 28.12.2018 Language of publication: RUS
Authors
MA
Maxim Belyaev
ABSTRACT
The article is devoted to the analysis of the value of motivation of court decisions in the criminal process. The author concludes that motivation largely determines the quality of the judicial decision, makes it understandable for society, promotes the transparency of justice; motivation in making decisions is an indispensable condition for a fair trial and, in the end, contributes to a respectful attitude to the authority of the judiciary. The decision on a particular case should presuppose a logically and structurally verified act containing a full analysis of the legal positions of the parties and an assessment of evidence. A motivated judicial act is considered by the author as one of the constituent parts of the standard of justice. In support of the arguments, the author analyzed a number of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. The trial should make the convict a better person, and this goal should be achieved through a reasoned presentation of the position occupied by the court in a particular criminal case, as well as by the general prevention of offenses. In addition, qualitatively motivated judicial acts contribute to the formation of legal certainty and, in particular, to the uniformity of the practice of the legal norm.
KEYWORDS
justification, evidence, conviction, motivation, the court
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Zagorskii G. I. Postanovlenie prigovora [Decision of sentence]. Moscow: Prospect, 208.

2. Tuzov N. A. Motivirovanie i preiuditsiia sudebnykh aktov [Motivation and prejudice of judicial acts]. Moscow: Rossiiskaia akademiia pravosudiia, 2006, 152.

3. Liupinskaia P. A. Resheniia v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ikh vidy, soderzhanie i formy [Decisions in criminal proceedings. Their types, contents, and forms]. Moscow: Iurid. lit., 1976, 168.

4. Ponomarenko V. A. Motivirovannost' sudebnogo resheniia v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse. Avtoref. diss. kand. iurid. nauk [Motivation of judgment in civil and arbitration procedure. Cand. Jurispr. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 2007, 24.

5. Kozina T. V. Sudebnoe sledstvie i obosnovannost' prigovora. Avtoref. diss. kand. iurid. nauk [Judicial investigation and validity of the verdict. Cand. Jurispr. Sci. Diss. Abstr.]. Moscow, 1992, 23.

6. Muratova N. D. Pravovaia kul'tura protsessual'nykh resheniia [The legal culture of procedural decisions]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Orenburg state university bulletin, no. 3 (2011): 106-111.

7. Kachalova O. V., Beliaev M. V. Verdict prisizhnykh zasedatelei i sotsial'nye zaprosy obshchestva [The jury verdict and social needs of society]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, no. 416 (2017): 176-180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/416/26

8. Shadarova A. N. Razvitie kontseptsii motivirovannosti sudebnykh reshenii v praktike Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [Development of the concept of motivation of judgments in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights]. Pretsedenty Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka = Precedents of the European Court of Human Rights, no. 5 (2016): 3-8.

9. Poliakov S. B. Pravonarushitel' - organ sudebnoy vlasti? [Is the wrong-doer is an agent of judicial power?]. Rossiiskii sud'ia = Russian Judge, no. 9 (2010): 26-30.

10. Marochkin O. І. Motivuvannia protsesualʹnikh rishenʹ slidchogo [Motivation of the procedural solutions of the witness]. Kiiv: Natsіonalʹna akademіia prokuraturi Ukraini, 2015, 214.

11. Sultanov A. R. Motivirovannast' sudebnogo akta kak odna iz osnovnykh problem spravedlivogo pravosudiia [Motivation of the judicial act as one of the main problems of fair justice]. Zakon = The Law, no. 8 (2014): 114-118.

12. Vasyaev A. A., Knyazkin S. A. Motivirovannost’ sudebniykh reshenii - standart Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Motivation of court decisions is the standard of the European Court of Human Rights]. Advokat = Advocate, no. 6 (2013): 27-32.

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
PDF Text JATS XML
The contact persons
Irina Morozova
Chief editor
Irina Morozova
ishmorozova@yandex.ru
Egor Trezubov
Deputy Editor-in-Chief
Egor Trezubov
egortrezubov@mail.ru
8995
downloads
RINC RINC Science Index Socionet Crossref Cyberleninka Dimensions ERIH PLUS VAK The Lens Directory of Open Access Journals
CC
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons
© КемГУ, 1997–2025
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2026 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?