Kazan, Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the analysis of the relationship between effective industrial policy and the innovation process in the modern economic system. The industrial policy determines the specifics of the industries development, the competitiveness of individual industrial enterprises and is based on a set of economic policies implemented by the state; however, it also has its own features. Innovation and investment processes are the basis of effective industrial policy. The purpose of the study is to consider various approaches to determining the interdependence of effective industrial policy and the innovation process of foreign and Russian scientists, as well as to analyze the factors and conditions that ensure the effectiveness of the state industrial policy implementation. As part of the analysis of factors and conditions that ensure the effectiveness of the state’s industrial policy, the article assesses the advantages and disadvantages of the industrial policy implementation and its impact on the state’s to form and regulate the innovation process. The author uses methods of scientific analysis and synthesis. The positive and negative features of the industrial policy implementation in modern Russian economy in the context of globalization are identified, the underestimation of the business sector’s role in the innovation process implementation is revealed. The factors that reduce the effectiveness of the industrial policy innovative model implementation due to the inconsistency of the tools and methods are identified. The conditions for ensuring the long-term economic development effectiveness are revealed. Modern industrial policy requires consideration of the factors influencing its efficiency, as well as the specifics of the investment and innovation process implementation in the national economy’s industrial development in the context of globalization. The improvement of the existing scientific research and education systems will ensure the long-term advanced development of domestic industry, provide an opportunity to develop import substitution and occupy new niches in the global economic system. Industrial policy is determined by the peculiarities of the innovation process implementation in the economic system. An innovative model of industrial policy implementation can ensure the long-term development of the national economic system and increase its competitiveness.
industry, industrial policy, economic development, innovation, investment, globalization
1. Tolstel M. S., Kosinova N. N., Grigorenko I. V., Shelestova D. A., Chigareva T. V. Development of methodological approach to analysis of sustainable development of industrial enterprises under the conditions of clustering. Russia and the European Union. Contributions to Economics, ed. Popkova E. Cham: Springer, 2017, 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55257-6_39
2. Xin L. The researches on operational mechanism of circular economy. International conference on management, 2013, 725-730.
3. Lorek E., Lorek P. Modern software tools in sustainable development programming. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 2017, 1: 72-80.
4. Chen J., Xiao Y., Zhou J. Comprehensive evaluation and prediction model of sustainable development. JIMET 2015: Proc. Joint Intern. Mechanical, Electronic and Information Technology Conf., Chongqing, 18-20 Dec 2015. Atlantis Press, 2015, 565-569. https://doi.org/10.2991/jimet-15.2015.107
5. Kralj D., Markič M. Sustainable development and processes innovation. Environmental Science, Ecosystems & Development: 5th WSEAS Intern. Conf. on Environment, Ecosystems and Development, Puerto De La Cruz, 14-16 Dec 2007. WSEAS Press, 2007, 200-206.
6. Selishcheva T. A. "Green" economy as a model of sustainable development in EEU countries. Problems of Modern Economics, 2018, (3): 6-12. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ynkpul
7. Wysokińska Z. Millenium Development Goals/UN and Sustainable Development Goals/UN as instruments for realising sustainable development concept in the global economy. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 2017, 20(1): 101-118.
8. Filho W. L., Azeiteiro U., Alves F., Pace P., Mifsud M., Brandli L., Caeiro S. S., Disterheft A. Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: the role of the sustainable development goals (SDG). International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2018, 25(2): 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1342103
9. Swain R. B., Yang-Wallentin F. Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2020, 27(2): 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1692316
10. Grib S. A. Industrial policy. Auditor, 2006, (1): 55-57. (In Russ.)
11. Karmanov Iu. Industrial policy and foreign economic relations. Ekonomist, 2008, (6): 31-35. (In Russ.)
12. Malaev V. V., Nizamutdinov I. K. Inequality and economic development of society. Economic Bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan, 2014, (1): 38-42. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/ryijeh
13. Bykova A. A. The issue of the formation of innovation clusters. Innovations, 2009, (8): 39-46. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/mjczuv
14. Katkalo V. S. Evolution of the strategic management theory. St. Petersburg: SPbU, 2006, 548. (In Russ.) https://www.elibrary.ru/qrytot
15. Kleiner G. B. State - region - field - enterprise: framework of economics system stability of Russia. Part 2. Ekonomika regiona, 2015, (3): 9-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-3-1
16. Safiullin A. R., Safiullina K. G., Gataullina L. R. Industry profile as the basis of competitive advantages of the territory. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2015, 10(2): 41-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.12737/12050
17. Rumelt R. P. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Lamb R. B. Competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1984, 556-570.
18. Rumelt R. P. Strategy, structure and economic performance. Harvard University, 1974, 235.
19. Teece D. J. Managing intellectual capital: organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford University Press, 2001, 312.
20. Teece D. J. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980, 1(3): 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90002-5
21. Teece D. J. Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1982, 3(1): 39-63.
22. Ashmarina S. I., Kandrashina E. A., Plaksina I. A. Modeling directed changes in global value chains as a promising development direction of change management theories and methodologies. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics, 2020, (12): 30-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2020-12-194-30-40
23. Ashmarina S. I., Murzagalina G. M. Entrepreneurial potential of Russian regions: comparative assessment and development prospects. Economic Systems in the New Era: Stable Systems in an Unstable World, eds. Ashmarina S. I., Horák J., Vrbka J., Šuleř P. Cham: Springer, 2021, 160: 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60929-0_5
24. Guseva M. S., Dmitrieva E. O. The competitiveness of single-industry cities in the digital transformation of the economy. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2020, 908: 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_20
25. Wallerstein I. The modern world-system II: mercantilism and the consolidation of the European world-economy (1600-1750). Moscow: Russkii Fond Sodeistviia Obrazovaniiu i Nauke, 2016, 528. (In Russ.)
26. Huntington S. P. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Moscow: AST, 2014, 576 p. (In Russ.)
