employee
Novokuzneck, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
In the Kemerovo Region, coal is a local socio-cultural construct that receives its substantive content through the local mass media discourse. Social studies of extractivism reveal the deep-rooted and significant impact of resource extraction on the modern society. This research relied on a discourse analysis of media routine and the meanings of coal it specifies. The method of discourse analysis is a phenomenological strategy of socio-cultural description; it clarifies the conceptual content of local media communities and registers the current state of the discursive environment. In the Kuzbass media, coal is an important resource that provides well-being, while coal mining is an extractive practice based on an unfair distribution of benefits and costs. This discourse objectifies the acts of collective signification of regional coal development activities. The economic discourse cultivates the idea of sustainable economic development of Kuzbass, while the ecological discourse defines the understanding of the specific coal-mining ecology. Media routine forms a social field of presence, where the regional community reproduces its collective identity and develops a language to describe the reality in which coal is the intersection point of economics, politics, ecology, and culture.
coal, extractivism, media, discourse, coal region, Kuzbass
1. Durante F., Kröger M., LaFleur W. Extraction and extractivisms. Definitions and concepts. Our extractive age. Expressions of violence and resistance, eds. Shapiro J., McNeish J.-A. London: Routledge, 2021, 19-30.
2. Mining encounters: extractive industries in an overheated world, eds. Pijpers R. J., Eriksen T. H. London: Pluto Press, 2018, 192.
3. Jacka J. K. The anthropology of mining: the social and environmental impacts of resource extraction in the mineral age. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 2018, 47: 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050156
4. Wapner P. Thresholds of injustice. Challenging the politics of environmental postponement. Our extractive age. Expressions of violence and resistance, eds. Shapiro J., McNeish J.-A. London: Routledge, 2021, 48-67.
5. Clark N., Yusoff K. Geosocial formations and the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society, 2017, 34(2-3): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416688946
6. The anthropology of resource extraction, eds. D’Angelo L., Pijpers R. J. London: Routledge, 2022, 248.
7. Junka-Aikio L., Cortes-Severino C. Cultural studies of extraction. Cultural Studies, 2017, 31(2-3): 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303397
8. Willow A. J. Understanding ExtrACTIVISM. Culture and power in natural resource disputes. London: Routledge, 2019, 294.
9. Brown B., Spiegel S. J. Coal, climate justice, and the cultural politics of energy transition. Global Environmental Politics, 2019, 19(2): 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00501
10. Lehotský L., Černoch F., Osička J., Ocelík P. When climate change is missing: Media discourse on coal mining in the Czech Republic. Energy Policy, 2019, 129: 774-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.065
11. Reshchikova I. P. Miner's territory as a regional brand. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2010, (1): 119-125. (In Russ.)
12. Manakov Yu. A., Kupriyanov A. N., Kopytov A. I. Kuzbass coal mining for the region stable development. Ugol, 2018, (9): 89-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2018-9-89-94
13. Sheveleva O. B., Slesarenko E. V. Sustainable development of a coal-mining region: technological and ecological aspects. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 2019, 13(4): 1537-1548. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.4.1537-1548
14. Drygin M. Yu. Evaluation of the perspectives of coal production in Kuzbass. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2020, (2): 87-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26730/1999-4125-2020-2-87-96
15. Novoselov S. V., Oganesyan A. S. Problems, risks and forecasts for the development of the coal industry in the Kemerovo region for the period 2025-2035. Ugol, 2021, (2): 38-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2021-2-38-41
16. Khoroshilova L. S., Osipova A. A. Coal mine safety as condition of the region social-political stability. Vestnik nauchnogo tsentra po bezopasnosti rabot v ugolnoi promyshlennosti, 2015, (2): 32-36. (In Russ.)
17. Kozhevnikov A. A. Regional policy and social safety of the coal enterprises. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin, 2009, (12): 26-31. (In Russ.)
18. Urban O. A. Institutional features of the interaction of business and government of the Kemerovo region. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo instituta ekonomiki i prava, 2012, (1): 39-47. (In Russ.)
19. Chirun S. N. Problems of the functioning of the regional political regime on the example of Kemerovo oblast. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya, 2018, (44): 253-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/44/24
20. Nevzorov T. B., Manakov D. A. Implementation problems of the environmental law norms in the industrial regions of Russia (the case of Kuzbass). Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2017, (4): 77-87. (In Russ.)
21. Sinkov L. S., Martemyanova A. N. Impact analysis coal mining enterprises of Kuzbass on the environment. Zapiski Gornogo instituta, 2014, 208: 65-69. (In Russ.)
22. Kopytov A. I., Kupriyanov A. N. A new strategy for the development of the coal industry of Kuzbass and solving environmental problems. Ugol, 2019, (11): 89-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2019-11-89-93
23. Babina S. I., Egorova N. M. Effect of resource economy on the standard of living in the Kemerovo Region. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2021, 6(3): 357-373. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2021-6-3-357-373
24. Shutko L. G., Samorodova L. L. The impact of the Kuzbass coal mining industry on the health of the region's population. Ugol, 2021, (9): 46-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2021-9-46-50
25. Poddubikov V. V., Osipov K. I. Land-use conflicts in the areas of the shor people’s traditional economic activities: types, factors and origin patterns. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, (3-3): 122-127. (In Russ.)
26. Avilov G. M. Features of the regional identity of young people of Kuzbass. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2019, (4): 6-17. (In Russ.)
27. Yanitskiy L. S. Image of Kuzbass in the perception of student youth of the region. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2020, (3): 99-106. (In Russ.)
28. Protasova T. N. Residency assessment as a factor of migration tenets of Kuzbass residents. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Politicheskie, sotsiologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki, 2019, 4(4): 367-375. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2019-4-4-367-375
29. Gerasimchuk D. M., Melnik N. V. The image of "Kemerovo region" in everyday language consciousness of the country residents as a result of the region political positioning. Filologiya i chelovek, 2019, (2): 111-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel(2019)2-10
30. Chepkasov A. V. Modelling of the image of the Kuznetsk basin according to the media. The World of Russian Word, 2018, (2): 36-40. (In Russ.)
31. Reznik Yu. M. Sociocultural approach as a research methodology. Voprosy sotsialnoi teorii, 2008, 2: 305-328. (In Russ.)
32. Gorlova I. I., Bychkova O. I., Kostina N. A., Sarkisova E. G. Methodological basis for studying the concept of "regional culture". Sovremennai'a nauka: aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriia: Poznanie, 2022, (3): 11-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37882/2500-3682.2022.03.05
33. Yakovleva E. N. The definition of the concept of regional culture. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2013, (4): 256-262. (In Russ.)
34. Poddubikov V. V., Artsemovich S. A., Funk D. A. The "resource curse" with a shade of anthracite: indigenous peoples and extractive companies of Kuzbass in a conflict situation. Sibirskie Istoricheskie Issledovaniia, 2018, (2): 142-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/2312461X/20/8
35. Energy humanities: an anthology, eds. Szeman I., Boyer D. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017, x+595.
36. Timoshchuk E. A. Discourse analysis as a phenomenological strategy of socio-cultural description. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiia. Psihologiia. Sociologiya, 2012, (4): 66-73. (In Russ.)
37. D’Angelo L., Pijpers R. J. Mining temporalities: an overview. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2018, 5(3): 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.02.005
38. Golub A. Leviathans at the gold mine: Creating indigenous and corporate actors in Papua New Guinea. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2014, 264.
39. Aldeia J., Alves F. Against the environment. Problems in society / nature relations. Frontiers in Sociology, 2019, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00029
40. Islam M. S. Sustainability through the lens of environmental sociology: an introduction. Sustainability, 2017, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030474
41. Mets A. Female mountain, masculine mining: an interpretation of entbergen. Eidos: Journal of Philosophy of the University Del Norte, 2018, (29): 119-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.14482/eidos.29.7129
42. Brown M. Managing nature-business as usual: resource extraction companies and their representations of natural landscapes. Sustainability, 2015, 7(12): 15900-15922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215791
43. Cunsolo A., Ellis N. R. Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8: 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2
44. Douglas M. Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge, 2002, 272.
