Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation
Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer documented health benefits upon the host. Among these, Lactobacilli remain the most popular probiotic cultures, largely due to their efficacy in preventing metabolic disorders. This article evaluates the probiotic potential of several Lactobacillus strains as key functional ingredients in metabolic dietary supplements and functional foods. The research featured Lactobacillus plantarum (B-5772, B-11264, B-3242), Lactobacillus fermentum (B-7574, B-7573), Lactobacillus acidophilus (B-194, B-2585, B-2900), and Lactobacillus casei (B-7951). The disc diffusion method revealed the degree of antibiotic resistance while the agar diffusion method made it possible to assess their antagonistic activity. The nutrient media were tested for carbohydrate sources to maximize the biomass accumulation in optical density units. The chromatographic analysis demonstrated the qualitative and quantitative composition of metabolites, i.e., B vitamins, organic acids, and amino acids. The biocompatibility of the strains was determined by co-cultivation. B-194 and B-7951 were resistant to streptomycin. B-7951 exhibited intermediate resistance to azithromycin while B-7573 and B-7951 were resistant to gentamicin, and B-3242 and B-7573 demonstrated a lack of susceptibility to streptomycin. B-11264 and B-7573 showed high antagonistic activity (≥23 mm) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa; B-7573 was effective against Bacillus cereus; B-11264, B-3242, and B-7951 resisted Enterococcus faecalis; B-11264, B-3242 and B-7573 showed good resistance to Klebsiella pneumoniae. The strains accumulated biomass better in the presence of lactulose. The chromatographic analysis showed that B-3242 produced vitamin B1 (25.98 ± 0.33 mg/g); B-7573 generated vitamin B3 (5.60 ± 0.03 mg/g); B-7573 yielded citric acid (52.6 ± 0.7 mg/L); B-2585 produced citric (58.0 ± 0.8 mg/L) and succinic (326.5 ± 3.2 mg/L) acids; B-7951 generated oxalic (17.1 ± 0.2 mg/L) and tartaric (17.1 ± 0.2 mg/L) acids. B-11264 produced tryptophan (16.2 ± 0.2 mg/g), glutamic acid (15.1 ± 0.2 mg/g), glycine (19.1 ± 0.2 mg/g), and proline (21.8 ± 0.3 mg/g). The strains demonstrated biocompatibility in co-cultivation. The strains involved in this research represent promising candidates for integration into probiotic nutraceuticals and functional food formulations.
Lactobacillus, probiotics, antagonistic activity, antibiotics, metabolites, biocompatibility of strains
1. Mu Q, Tavella VJ, Luo XM. Role of Lactobacillus reuteri in human health and diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00757
2. Khoziev AM, Evdokimov IA, Tsugkiev BG, Gogaev OK, Kabisov RG, et al. Lactobacilli strains with targeted technological properties in sour-cream butter biotechnology. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2025;55(3):552–557. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2025-3-2594
3. Zimina MI, Sukhin SA, Babich OO, Noskova SYu, Abrashina AA, et al. Investigating antibiotic activity of the genus Bacillus strains and properties of their bacteriocins in order to develop next-generation pharmaceuticals. Food and Raw Materials. 2016;4(2):92–100. http://doi.org/10.21179/2308-4057-2016-2-92-100
4. Markowiak P, Slizewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9091021
5. Li H-Y, Zhou D-D, Gan R-Y, Huang S-Y, Zhao C-N, et al. Effects and mechanisms of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics on metabolic diseases targeting gut microbiota: A narrative review. Nutrients. 2021;13(9):3211. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093211
6. Vesnina AD, Frolova AS, Chekushkina DYu, Milentyeva IS, Luzyanin SL, et al. Gut microbiota and its role in development of chronic disease and aging. Foods and Raw Materials. 2026;14(1):174–197. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2026-1-668
7. Kishilova SA, Leonova VA, Mitrova VA, Rozhkova IV. Advanced biotechnological solutions for lactic acid bacteria in dairy industry: from strain selection to probiotic products. Food Processing: Techniques and Technology. 2025;55(3):624–633. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2025-3-2596
8. Vougiouklaki D, Tsironi T, Tsantes AG, Tsakali E, Van Impe JFM, et al. Probiotic properties and antioxidant activity in vitro of lactic acid bacteria. Microorganisms. 2023;11(5):1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051264
9. Shah AB, Baiseitova A, Zahoor M, Ahmad I, Ikram M, et al. Probiotic significance of Lactobacillus strains: A comprehensive review on health impacts, research gaps, and future prospects. Gut Microbes. 2024;16(1):2431643. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2024.2431643
10. Kharitonov DV, Kharitonova IV, Prosekov AYu. The concept of synbiotics and symbiotic dairy products development. Food Processing: Techniques and Techology. 2013;31(4):91–94. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/RNIEON
11. Vesnina AD, Fotina NV, Prosekov AYu, Kozlova OV, Dyshlyuk LS. Obtaining a probiotic consortium based on strains isolated from cow’s milk. Dairy Herald. 2021;(2):107–121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52231/2225-4269_2021_2_107
12. Vesnina AD, Prosekov AY, Kozlova OV, Kurbanova MG, Kozlenko EA. Development of a probiotic consortium for people with cancer. VSUET Bulletin. 2021;83(1):219–232. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20914/2310-1202-2021-1-219-232
13. Pereira GVM, Coelho BO, Júnior AIM, Thomaz-Soccol V, Soccol CR. How to select a probiotic? A review and update of methods and criteria. Biotechnology Advances. 2018;36(8):2060–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.003
14. Sharifi-Rad J, Rodrigues CF, Stojanović-Radić Z, Dimitrijević M, Aleksić A, et al. Probiotics: Versatile bioactive components in promoting human health. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(9):433. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090433
15. Namiti VB, Nyerere AK, Kiiru JN. Stimulatory effects of simple sugars, honey, and selected defined minerals on growth vigor and production of inhibitory effects against selected Pathogens by a probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus strain: An in vitro study. International Journal of Novel Research in Life Sciences. 2024;11(3):1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11108950
16. Dimov I, Mollova D, Vasileva T, Bivolarski V, Nikolova M, et al. Metabolic profiling of probiotic strain Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus L14 cultivated in presence of prebiotic oligosaccharides and polysaccharides in simulating in vitro gastrointestinal tract system. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2023;37(1):260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2023.2178825
17. Dong Y, Han M, Fei T, Liu H, Gai Z. Utilization of diverse oligosaccharides for growth by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species and their in vitro co-cultivation characteristics. Int Microbiol. 2024;27:941–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-023-00446-x
18. Froböse NJ, Bjedov S, Schuler F, Kahl BC, Kampmeier S, et al. Gram staining: a comparison of two automated systems and manual staining. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58(12):e01914-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01914-20
19. Shevchenko IA. Radiotelemetry study of temperature in the gastrointestinal tract. Kazan Medical Journal. 1968;49(3):14–17. (In Russ.)
20. Guryeva VI, Bachinskaya VM, Sharapova NR. Determination of the sensitivity of probiotic bacterial strains to antibacterial drugs using the disk diffusion method. Bulletin of Mari State University. Series «Agricultural Sciences. Economic Sciences». 2024;10(1):9–16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30914/2411-9687-2024-10-1-9-16
21. Davoodabadi A, Dallal MM, Foroushani AR, Douraghi M, Yazdi MKS, et al. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from the feces of healthy infants against enteropathogenic bacteria. Anaerobe. 2015;34:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.04.014
22. Pazhoohan M, Sadeghi F, Moghadami M. Antimicrobial and antiadhesive effects of Lactobacillus isolates of healthy human gut origin on Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC). Microbial Pathogenesis. 2020;148:104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104271
23. Jomehzadeh N, Javaherizadeh H, Amin M, Saki M, Al-Ouqaili MTS, et al. Isolation and identification of potential probiotic Lactobacillus species from feces of infants in southwest Iran. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;96:524–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.034
24. Serazetdinova YuR, Chekushkina DYu, Borodina EE, Kolpakova DE, Minina VI, et al. Synergistic interaction between Azotobacter and Pseudomonas bacteria in a growth-stimulating consortium. Foods and Raw Materials. 2025;13(2):376–393. http://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2025-2-651
25. Frolova AS, Fokina AD, Milentyeva IS, Asyakina LK, Proskuryakova LA, et al. The biological active substances of Taraxacum officinale and Arctium lappa from the Siberian Federal District. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(6):3263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063263
26. Belashova OV, Kozlova OV, Velichkovich NS, Fokina AD, Yustratov VP, et al. A phytochemical study of the clover growing in Kuzbass. Foods and Raw Materials. 2024;12(1):194–206. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2024-1-599
27. Frolova AS, Chekushkina DYu, Loseva AI, Neverova OA, Zaushintsena AV, et al. Potential of lactic acid bacteria-probiotics with the prospects of their use in cheese making. Cheese and butter making. 2025;4:70–76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2073-4018-2025-4-35
28. Darbandi N, Komijani M, Abdoli A. Azithromycin therapy changed the intestinal microbiota, caused oxidative stress, and decreased memory function in adult wistar rats. Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran. 2024;35(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsciences.2024.374944.1007858
29. Li T, Teng D, Mao R, Hao Y, Wang X, et al. A critical review of antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria. Food Research International. 2020;136:109571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109571
30. Dang HT, Dinh HS, Loc TA, Nguyen LA. Antibiotic resistance characteristics of potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains. Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology. 2023;61(6):975–983. https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/17261
31. Sukarya IBJ, Pratiwi IDPK, Hapsari NMIA, Puspawati NN. Antibiotic resistance of indigenous lactic acid bacteria isolates of kombucha and dadih. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan. 2021;10(4):734–745.
32. Ma Q, Pei Z, Fang Z, Wang H, Zhu J, et al. Evaluation of tetracycline resistance and determination of the tentative microbiological cutoff values in lactic acid bacterial species. Microorganisms, 2021;9(10):2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102128
33. Soltani N, Abbasi S, Baghaeifar S, Taheri E, Jadid MFS, et al. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of Lactobacillus strains secretome and extraction against Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infection. Biotechnology Reports. 2022;36:e00760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2022.e00760
34. Tigu F, Assefa F, Mehari T, Ashenafi M. Probiotic property of lactic acid bacteria from traditional fermented condiments: Datta and awaze. International Food Research Journal. 2016;23(2):770. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33845.35041
35. Li J, Chen X, Xie Z, Liang L, Li A, et al. Screening and metabolomic analysis of lactic acid bacteria-antagonizing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Foods. 2023;12(14):2799. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12142799
36. Sanam MUE, Detha AIR, Rohi NK. Detection of antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria, isolated from Sumba mare’s milk, against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research. 2022;9(1):53–58. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2022.i568
37. Ravi S, Ananthan HB, Reddy BN, Sankar S, Natarajan SN, et al. Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of two commercially available probiotics as intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023;24:157–161. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3466
38. Fateh M, Forohi F, Rafiee F. The antimicrobial effect of Lactobacillus casei against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolated from urinary samples. Journal of Advanced Biomedical Sciences. 2024;14(2):94–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jabs.v14i2.15755
39. Kim J-Y, Choi E-J, Lee J-H, Yoo M-S, Heo K, et al. Probiotic potential of a novel vitamin B2-overproducing Lactobacillus plantarum strain, HY7715, isolated from kimchi. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(13):5765. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135765
40. Kim S-H, Singh D, Son SYo, Lee S, Suh D H, et al. Characterization and temporal dynamics of the intra- and extracellular environments of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum using multi-platform metabolomics. LWT. 2023;175:114376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114376
41. Laakso K, Koskenniemi K, Koponen J, Kankainen M, Surakka A, et al. Growth phase‐associated changes in the proteome and transcriptome of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in industrial‐type whey medium. Microbial Biotechnology. 2011;4(6):746–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00275.x
42. Khromova NY, Epishkina JM, Karetkin BA, Khabibulina NV, Beloded AV, et al. The combination of in vitro assessment of stress tolerance ability, autoaggregation, and vitamin B-producing ability for new probiotic strain introduction. Microorganisms. 2022;10(2):470. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020470
43. Szczerbiec D, Piechocka J, Glowacki R, Torzewska A. Organic acids secreted by Lactobacillus spp. isolated from urine and their antimicrobial activity against uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. Molecules. 2022;27(17):5557. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175557
44. Wang J, Tang X, Qu C, Zhang Y, Zhang C, et al. Development of an LC-MS method for the quantitative determination of six organic acids produced by bacterial fermentation in vitro and in vivo. Processes. 2025;13(3):697. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030697
45. Liu E, Hao P, Konno T, Yu Y, Oda M, et al. Amino acid biosynthesis and proteolysis in Lactobacillus bulgaricus Revisited: A Genomic Comparison. Computation Molecular Bioscience. 2012;2(3):61–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cmb.2012.23006
46. Ulmer A, Erdemann F, Mueller S, Loesch M, Wildt S, et al. Differential amino acid uptake and depletion in mono-cultures and co-cultures of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in a novel semi-synthetic medium. microorganisms. 2022;10(9):1771. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091771
47. Wu Yu., Zhang Q., Ren Yi., Ruan Z. Effect of probiotic Lactobacillus on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178868
48. Qiu X, Wu Q, Li W, Tang K, Zhang J. Effects of Lactobacillus supplementation on glycemic and lipid indices in overweight or obese adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition. 2022;41(8):1787–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2022.06.030
49. Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Chassaing B, Langella P. Exploring the interaction and impact of probiotic and commensal bacteria on vitamins, minerals and short chain fatty acids metabolism. Microbial Cell Factories. 2024;23:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02449-3
