Virtual Communication and Social Networks Virtual Communication and Social Networks Виртуальная коммуникация и социальные сети 2782-4799 2782-4802 84231 10.21603/2782-4799-2024-3-2-126-134 Междисциплинарные исследования языка Interdisciplinary Linguistics Междисциплинарные исследования языка Effect of Gender and Communicative Situation on Double Spatial Orientation in Virtual Speech Гендерная и коммуникативная специфика двойной пространственной ориентации говорящего в виртуальной реальности https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4447-1288 Белоусов Константин Игоревич Belousov Konstantin Igorevich belousovki@gmail.com

доктор филологических наук;

doctor of philological sciences;

 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1901-8572 Талески Александар Taleski Aleksandar taleski87@yahoo.com Белорусский государственный университет иностранных языков Минск Беларусь Belarusian State University of Foreign Languages Minsk Belarus Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет Россия Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет Russian Federation Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет Пермь Россия Perm State University Perm Russian Federation 08 08 2024 08 08 2024 3 2 126 134 22 02 2024 08 04 2024 https://vestnik-pses.kemsu.ru/en/nauka/article/84231/view

Передача пространственного отношения между объектами в коммуникативном акте является одной из основных когнитивных функций. Пространственные отношения отражают категории, с которыми сталкивается каждый человек в процессе осуществления собственной жизнедеятельности. В работе рассматривается двойная пространственная ориентация говорящего в среде виртуальной реальности (VR). Цель – представить специфику двойной ориентации говорящего в VR-пространстве в зависимости от двух факторов: коммуникативных параметров ситуации и неязыкового фактора гендер у испытуемых. Двойная пространственная ориентация является комбинацией эгоцентрической, аллоцентрической или геоцентрической ориентаций и их разновидностей. Специфика использования комбинаций двойной ориентации может быть обусловлена различными факторами. В нашем исследовании впервые делается попытка продемонстрировать влияние экстралингвистического фактора гендер у испытуемых и коммуникативных параметров самой ситуации на двойную пространственную ориентацию говорящего в VR. С этой целью нами был проведен эксперимент в VR-среде, в котором участвовали 24 информанта и применялись пять сцен с различными коммуникативными параметрами. В качестве материала было получено 725 реплик, в которых обнаруживаются комбинации двойных ориентаций. Анализ полученного материала производился в ИС Семограф. Результаты анализа показали превалирование комбинации аллоцентрической и геоцентрической ориентаций, а также тенденцию влияния гендерного фактора и некоторых коммуникативных параметров на частоту встречаемости комбинаций двойной пространственной ориентации говорящего. Основной вывод проведенного исследования заключается в том, что ядром двойной пространственной ориентации говорящего в VR выступают комбинации аллоцентрической и геоцентрической ориентаций на топос – GE \ T + AL и AL + GE \ T.

A clear and unambiguous rendering of spatial relations is the key cognitive function of communication. Spatial relationships reflect the categories and experience shared by all people. The paper introduces the first-of-its-kind attempt to describe the dual spatial orientation of the speaker in virtual reality as depending on two factors: the communicative situation and the gender. Dual spatial orientation combines egocentric, allocentric, or geocentric orientations and their varieties. The combination depends on various factors. The experiment in virtual environment involved 24 informants and five scenarios (scenes) with different communicative parameters. It yielded 725 responses with combinations of double orientations, which went through the IS Semograph. The combination of allocentric and geocentric orientation domineered; the extra-linguistic gender factor and some communicative parameters affected the frequency of combinations of dual spatial orientation. The core of the speaker’s dual spatial orientation in virtual reality combined allocentric and geocentric orientations to the topos of GE \ T + AL and AL + GE \ T.

 виртуальная реальность пространственная ориентация дейксис гендер коммуникация virtual reality spatial orientation deixis gender communication

Талески А. Поведение говорящего в виртуальной реальности (методика эксперимента и описание предварительных результатов). Вестник Пермского университета. Российская и зарубежная филология. 2020. Т. 12. № 4. С. 54–67. https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2020-4-54-67 Taleski A. Speaker's behavior in virtual reality (methodology of the experiment and description of preliminary results). Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 2020, 12(4): 54–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/2073-6681-2020-4-54-67 Berthele R. Ort und Weg. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006, 305. Berthele R. Ort und Weg. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006, 305. Bohil C., Owen Ch. B., Jeong E. J., Alicea B., Biocca F. Virtual reality and presence. 21st century communication: A reference handbook, ed. Eadie W. F. Newbury park: Sage, 2009, 534–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412964005 Bohil C., Owen Ch. B., Jeong E. J., Alicea B., Biocca F. Virtual reality and presence. 21st century communication: A reference handbook, ed. Eadie W. F. Newbury park: Sage, 2009, 534–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412964005 Bryant D. J. A spatial representation system in humans. Psycholoquy, 1992, 3(16). URL: https://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?3.16 (accessed 23 Apr 2024). Bryant D. J. A spatial representation system in humans. Psycholoquy, 1992, 3(16). URL: https://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?3.16 (accessed 23 Apr 2024). Byagowi A., Moussavi Z. Design of a Virtual Reality Navigational (VRN) experiment for assessment of egocentric spatial cognition. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Proc. Conf., San Diego, 1 Sep 2012. San Diego: IEEE, 2012, 4812–4815. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347070 Byagowi A., Moussavi Z. Design of a Virtual Reality Navigational (VRN) experiment for assessment of egocentric spatial cognition. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Proc. Conf., San Diego, 1 Sep 2012. San Diego: IEEE, 2012, 4812–4815. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347070 Castronovo F., Nikolic D., Liu Y., Messner J. An evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems for design reviews. 13th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality: Proc. Conf., London, 30–31 Oct 2013. London: UK, 2013, 22–29. Castronovo F., Nikolic D., Liu Y., Messner J. An evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems for design reviews. 13th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality: Proc. Conf., London, 30–31 Oct 2013. London: UK, 2013, 22–29. Creem-Regehr S. H., Stefanucci J. K., Thompson W. B. Perceiving absolute scale in virtual environments: How theory and application have mutually informed the role of body-based perception. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2015, 62: 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.006 Creem-Regehr S. H., Stefanucci J. K., Thompson W. B. Perceiving absolute scale in virtual environments: How theory and application have mutually informed the role of body-based perception. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2015, 62: 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.006 Fox J., Arena D., Bailenson J. N. Virtual Reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 2009, 21(3): 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95 Fox J., Arena D., Bailenson J. N. Virtual Reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 2009, 21(3): 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95 Gramann K. Embodiment of spatial reference frames and individual differences in reference frame proclivity. Spatial Cognition & Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2013, 13(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2011.589038 Gramann K. Embodiment of spatial reference frames and individual differences in reference frame proclivity. Spatial Cognition & Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2013, 13(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2011.589038 Interrante V., Ries B., Anderson L. Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference: Proc. Conf., Alexandria, 25–29 Mar 2006. Alexandria: IEEE, 2006, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.52 Interrante V., Ries B., Anderson L. Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference: Proc. Conf., Alexandria, 25–29 Mar 2006. Alexandria: IEEE, 2006, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2006.52 Jones J. A., Hopper J. E., Bolas M. T., Krum D. M. Orientation perception in real and virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2019, 25(5): 2050–2060. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2898798 Jones J. A., Hopper J. E., Bolas M. T., Krum D. M. Orientation perception in real and virtual environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2019, 25(5): 2050–2060. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2898798 Keshner E. A., Kenyon R. V. Postural and spatial orientation driven by virtual reality. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2009, 145: 209–228. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-018-6-209 Keshner E. A., Kenyon R. V. Postural and spatial orientation driven by virtual reality. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2009, 145: 209–228. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-018-6-209 Kim J. J.-J., McManus M. E., Harris L. R. Body orientation affects the perceived size of objects. Perception, 2022, 51(1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066211065673 Kim J. J.-J., McManus M. E., Harris L. R. Body orientation affects the perceived size of objects. Perception, 2022, 51(1): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066211065673 Klatzky R. L. Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1998, 1: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1 Klatzky R. L. Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1998, 1: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1 Levinson S. C. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. Language and Space, 1996, 109–169. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4107.003.0006 Levinson S. C. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. Language and Space, 1996, 109–169. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4107.003.0006 Levinson S. C. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 414. Levinson S. C. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 414. Levinson S. C. Vision, shape, and linguistic description: Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description. Linguistics, 1994, 32(4-5): 791–855. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.4-5.791 Levinson S. C. Vision, shape, and linguistic description: Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description. Linguistics, 1994, 32(4-5): 791–855. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.4-5.791 Mohler B. J., Creem-Regehr S. H., Thompson W. B. The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. APGV '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization: Proc. Symp., Boston, 28–29 Jul 2006. NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2006, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1140491.1140493 Mohler B. J., Creem-Regehr S. H., Thompson W. B. The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. APGV '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization: Proc. Symp., Boston, 28–29 Jul 2006. NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2006, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1140491.1140493 Moon H.-J., Wu H.-P., Falco E., Blanke O. Physical body orientation impacts virtual navigation experience and performance. Eneuro, 2023, 10(11): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0218-23.2023 Moon H.-J., Wu H.-P., Falco E., Blanke O. Physical body orientation impacts virtual navigation experience and performance. Eneuro, 2023, 10(11): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0218-23.2023 Morganti F., Stefanini S., Riva G. From allo- to egocentr ic spatial ability in early Alzheimer’s disease: A study with virtual reality spatial tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2013, 4(3-4): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.854762 Morganti F., Stefanini S., Riva G. From allo- to egocentr ic spatial ability in early Alzheimer’s disease: A study with virtual reality spatial tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2013, 4(3-4): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.854762 Park C., Jang K. Investigation of visual self-representation for a Walking-in-Place navigation system in virtual reality. IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR): Proc. Conf., Osaka, 23–27 Mar 2019. Osaka: IEEE, 2019, 1114–1115. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798345 Park C., Jang K. Investigation of visual self-representation for a Walking-in-Place navigation system in virtual reality. IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR): Proc. Conf., Osaka, 23–27 Mar 2019. Osaka: IEEE, 2019, 1114–1115. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798345 Pastel S., Chen C. H., Bürger D., Naujoks M., Martin L. F., Petri K., Witte K. Spatial orientation in virtual environment compared to real-world. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2020, 53(6): 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2020.1843390 Pastel S., Chen C. H., Bürger D., Naujoks M., Martin L. F., Petri K., Witte K. Spatial orientation in virtual environment compared to real-world. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2020, 53(6): 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2020.1843390 Peeters D. Virtual reality: A game-changing method for the language sciences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2019, 26(3): 894–900. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01571-3 Peeters D. Virtual reality: A game-changing method for the language sciences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2019, 26(3): 894–900. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01571-3 Phillips L., Interrante V., Kaeding M., Ries B., Anderson L. Correlations between physiological response, gait, personality, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence, 2012, 21(2): 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00100 Phillips L., Interrante V., Kaeding M., Ries B., Anderson L. Correlations between physiological response, gait, personality, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence, 2012, 21(2): 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00100 Shelton A. L., McNamara T. P. Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997, 4(1): 102–106. Shelton A. L., McNamara T. P. Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997, 4(1): 102–106. Wartenberg F., May M., Peruch P. Spatial orientation in virtual environments: Background considerations and experiments. Spatial Cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge, eds. Freksa C., Habel C., Wender K. F. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; Barcelona; Budapest; Hong Kong; London; Milan; Paris; Santa Clara; Singapore; Tokyo: Springer, 1998, 1404: 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_22 Wartenberg F., May M., Peruch P. Spatial orientation in virtual environments: Background considerations and experiments. Spatial Cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge, eds. Freksa C., Habel C., Wender K. F. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; Barcelona; Budapest; Hong Kong; London; Milan; Paris; Santa Clara; Singapore; Tokyo: Springer, 1998, 1404: 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_22 Wolbers T., Hegarty M. What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Science, 2010, 14(3): 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001 Wolbers T., Hegarty M. What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Science, 2010, 14(3): 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001